patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Midtown Preservation

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Should the Crum & Forster be saved?

Reports say preservationists to sue the City of Atlanta in order to save the Midtown Landmark building.

The fate of Midtown's Landmark Crum & Forster building continues to twist and turn. On Monday, WABE reported that preservationists were readying to sue the City of Atlanta in order to save the building. The station indicated that a local attorney was to file notice of ante litem on behalf of a group who believe City officials are ignoring their own preservation regulations. Preservationists thought they had scored a significant victory in early August when the Atlanta Urban Design Commission (UDC) voted unanimously to reject an Economic Review Panel’s recommendation to side with the Georgia Tech Foundation Real Estate Holding Corporation’s (GTF) application to demolish the rear two-thirds of the building. But last month, the City and the …

Cynthia

8:34 pm on Monday, December 17, 2012

Maybe it's just me, but I think this building would make a great Apple store. Apple is known for adapting their modern stores to old architecture (see: grand central station or pretty much any store in Europe). The Barnes & Noble next door already has an apple section that could stand to be expanded. It's perfectly located for GA Tech students and Midtown residents. Not to mention, bringing a …   more ›

Monday, June 25, 2012

Review Panel Sides With Georgia Tech Foundation Concerning Crum & Forster

Unless preservationists can convince three-fourths of the Atlanta UDC that the panel's findings are wrong, two-thirds of Landmark Midtown building will most likely be demolished.

With a possible hearing concerning the fate of Midtown’s Landmark Crum & Forster building just days away, the Georgia Tech Foundation appears to have scored a significant victory in the battle over the historic structure located at 771 Spring Street. On Wednesday afternoon, the Atlanta Urban Design Commission (UDC) is scheduled to again hear from representatives from both the foundation and preservationists as to why the back two-thirds of the building should or should not be removed in order to make way for a High Performing Computing Center, a potential 24-story, 680,000 square-foot public-private development on the block. Almost two months ago, Georgia Tech representatives explained to the UDC that it was not economically feasible to …

Patch_comments_icon

Hunt Archbold

6:22 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012

At last week’s Atlanta Urban Design Commission hearing, the application for a Type IV Certificate of Appropriateness for demolition due to unreasonable economic return submitted by the Georgia Tech Foundation for the Crum & Forster Building, was deferred to August 8, 2012.   more ›

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

MNA: Do Not Demolish Crum and Forster Building

The Midtown Neighbors' Association respectfully recommends the AUDC reject The Georgia Tech Foundation’s application to demolish two-thirds of designated Landmark structure in Midtown.

The following position paper from the Midtown Neighbors Association's Land Use Committee is a formal response to the filing of the Georgia Tech Foundation to demolish two-thirds of the Landmark Status Crum and Forster Building. This Application will be heard at the AUDC on May 9, 2012. The applicant was not required to present to the Land Use Committee of the for recommendation. Applicant seeks a Certificate of Appropriateness Type IV Unreasonable Economic Return for the purpose of acquiring a demolition permit that will allow the demolition of the rear 2/3’s of the historic structure for the purposes of an expansion of its Technology Square project. The MNA Opposes the Certificate of Application INTRODUCTION/ HISTORY The Midtown Neighbor’…

Teyeger

12:27 pm on Monday, May 7, 2012

Z-07-59 and Z-07-77 are the two I was thinking, both times developers asked for higher density zonings, both times the MNA recommended rezonings without doing anything to first encourage TDR (even though it was pointed out several times that TDR could be used instead of rezoning). Then a few months later GT wanted to tear down Crum and Foster, and the MNA is in an uproar.   more ›

Got a Hot Tip?
 
 

Videos